top of page

OUR RUBRIC

AWARENESS

Candidates' understanding of the dynamics within, struggles impacting, and strengths of the global and local LGBTQ community.

HISTORY OF ADVOCACY

Candidates' history of advocacy. Bonus points if they can demonstrate tangible outcomes that benefited the LGBTQ community.

VISION FOR THE FUTURE

Candidates' vision for the future of the LGBTQ community in the Georgetown community. Their vision to include LGBTQ voices in their own cabinets.

CONCRETENESS OF POLICY

Strength of candidates' plans to advocate for the needs of the LGBTQ community.

Results: List

How We Graded:

Eight students from GLMR, Pride, and QPOC graded each response blindly on a scale of 1-10. We omitted any names to ensure there was no bias when grading the responses. Then, each candidate received an average score for each question based on the 8 graders’ scores. Their overall score was then calculated based on these scores. Some questions were weighted more heavily than others due to the significance of the questions. For example, our last question regarding policy plans was weighted twice as much given its significance.

Results: Text
image_edited_edited.jpg

FERRETTI/BADGER

94% (A)

image_edited_edited.jpg

GONZALEZ PORRAS/FIGUEROA-FLORES

73% (C)

Results: Services
image.png

MARIN-MORA/DELEON

72% (C-)

image_edited.jpg

SALMERON-PERLA

52% (F)

Results: Services
bottom of page